Author: Jim

Fwd: NYTimes: Censoring Climate Change

Brian comet 
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone

——– Original message ——–
From: Brian Ledvina <ledvina.electric@gmail.com&gt;
Date: 11/22/17 7:56 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: Jim Barney <jbarney@farmjobsearch.net&gt;
Subject: Re: NYTimes: Censoring Climate Change

Too much reading.

I believe it is and has been a hoax since i first heard of it in the early 90’s. And even if its not and can be proven i don’t care. The earth will take care of itself and we will have to adapt or go away

On Nov 22, 2017 9:41 AM, "Jim Barney" <jbarney@farmjobsearch.net> wrote:

 I would like to know what you think of this article.  It is unlikely that Fox News will cover the story.  🙂 

Censoring Climate Change https://nyti.ms/2hVsWw1

Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone

NYTimes: Can A.I. Be Taught to Explain Itself?

Can A.I. Be Taught to Explain Itself? nyti.ms/2hR2weQ

Those techniques can seem inescapably alien to our own ways of thinking. Instead of certainty and cause, A.I. works off probability and correlation. And yet A.I. must nonetheless conform to the society we’ve built — one in which decisions require explanations, whether in a court of law, in the way a business is run or in the advice our doctors give us. The disconnect between how we make decisions and how machines make them, and the fact that machines are making more and more decisions for us, has birthed a new push for transparency and a field of research called explainable A.I., or X.A.I. Its goal is to make machines able to account for the things they learn, in ways that we can understand. But that goal, of course, raises the fundamental question of whether the world a machine sees can be made to match our own.
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone