“The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born; now is the time of monsters.” — Antonio Gramsci

The phrase “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters” is 

a renowned quote attributed to Antonio Gramsci, an influential Italian Marxist philosopher and politician. He penned this observation in his Prison Notebooks while incarcerated under Mussolini’s Fascist regime in the 1930s. 

The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be ...

Meaning and context

Gramsci’s statement encapsulates the feeling of being caught in a period of interregnum, a term he used to describe a transitional period where an old, dominant political and social order (hegemony) has lost its ability to lead through consent but a new order has not yet emerged to take its place. 

  • The “old world dying” signifies the crumbling of existing power structures, ideologies, and societal norms that no longer command widespread allegiance.
  • The “new world struggling to be born” indicates the uncertainty and challenges associated with establishing a new social and political order.
  • The “time of monsters” refers to the chaotic and unstable period that arises during this transition, where various “morbid symptoms” can appear, including extremism, authoritarianism, social upheaval, and political instability. 

In essence, Gramsci’s quote describes a state of profound crisis and instability, where the established order is collapsing and the path forward is unclear, leading to the rise of unpredictable and potentially dangerous forces that thrive in such uncertainty. 

Contemporary relevance

The quote remains highly relevant today and is often used to describe various periods of significant societal and political transitions, such as:

  • The decline of globalization and the rise of new global power dynamics, according to Andrew Latham.
  • The collapse of established political orders and the rise of populist and nationalist movements.
  • Periods of rapid technological change and its impact on society and employment. 

In each case, Gramsci’s words offer a lens through which to understand the instability, anxiety, and potential for both progressive and regressive developments during these periods of fundamental change. 

AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more

$$$$$$ ***** America’s ‘Marriage Material’ Shortage

“Social isolation is rising alongside romantic isolation, as the economic and cultural trajectories of men and women move in opposite directions,” @DKThomp writes.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/02/america-marriage-decline/681518/?gift=yGKGqaI9BMfIDuch_TrGYdz2WmENaCyIFjSV51Ovqig&utm_source=email&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social

$$$$$$ ****** How Progressives Froze the American Dream

Americans were once the most mobile people on the planet. Now they’re stuck in place. @YAppelbaum reports on why Americans stopped moving to new homes in new places—and why that’s a big problem:

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2025/03/american-geographic-social-mobility/681439/?gift=yGKGqaI9BMfIDuch_TrGYbip2g73G0lTEBdPUwqspOQ&utm_source=email&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social

These three principles—consistency, tolerance, and abundance—can help restore American mobility. Federal guidelines can make the environment more amenable, but the solutions by and large cannot come from central planning; states and cities and towns will need to reform their rules and processes to allow the housing supply to grow where people want to build. The goal of policy makers, in any case, shouldn’t be to move Americans to any particular place, or to any particular style of living. They should instead aim to make it easier for Americans to move wherever they would like—to make it equally easy to build wherever Americans’ hopes and desires alight.